How can mapping reveal previously unseen urban injustices or misunderstood phenomenon?
In 1973, David Harvey remarked that “mapping even more evidence of man’s patent inhumanity to man is counter-revolutionary in the sense that it allows the bleeding-heart liberal in us to pretend we are contributing to a solution when in fact we are not”. But rather than simply documenting these inhumanities, examples abound of mapping and data being used to actively challenge entrenched forms of inequality and the processes that produce them. Building on the power imbued in maps and data by powerful institutions, mapping is increasingly leveraged as a key means of drawing attention to, and developing new understandings of, urban inequality. While there is a persistent challenge in ensuring that cartographic visualization and quantitative data analysis do more than just “expiate guilt without our ever being forced to face the fundamental issues”, these tools and methods have just as much potential to advance a substantive, radical critique of the status quo as any other approach.
This session seeks papers that demonstrate the utility of not only thinking critically about the intersections of mapping and urban inequality, but actually doing mapping and data analysis in order to reveal and better understand the variety of social and spatial forms these injustices take in contemporary cities. While the utility of maps and data to bring attention to urban injustices is powerful in its own right, these kinds of representations can not only help to prove that such injustices exist, but also allow us to develop new ways of conceptualizing and addressing them.
Possible topics might include, but are not limited to:
- Use of novel datasets or visualization techniques to understand urban injustices
- Inequalities in housing, transportation, infrastructure, etc.
- Counter-mapping as an activist strategy
- Participatory and community-based mapping
- Mixed-methods mapping (e.g., mental and cognitive mapping, qualitative GIS)
- Mapping that redraws boundaries
- Power and il/legibility in mapping
|Presenter||Willow Lung-Amam*, University of Maryland, Nicholas Finio, University of Maryland, Gerrit Knaap, University of Maryland, Casey Dawkins, University of Maryland, Shifting the Landscape of Metropolitan Equity and Opportunity through Mapping: Case Studies of Five U.S. Metros||20||3:20 PM|
|Presenter||Mariya Shcheglovitova*, University of Maryland - Baltimore County, Mapping Baltimore's Urban Forest: Challenging discourses of justice through spatial representations||20||3:40 PM|
|Presenter||Kirsten Schwarz*, Northern Kentucky University, Adam Berland, Ball State University, Dustin L. Herrmann, University of Cincinnati, Does volunteer vegetation in shrinking cities create a false narrative of environmental justice? Results from Toledo, OH||20||4:00 PM|
|Presenter||SEUNGHO YOO*, University College London, Sooyeon Lim*, , Hyeon Seon Yi*, Urban Regeneration Center Seoul, Unfolding spatial characteristics of high dense public housing area: focusing on the analysis of Ansan, South Korea||20||4:20 PM|
|Presenter||Simone Tulumello*, Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Ciências Sociais, Alessandro Colombo, ISCTE-IUL, Dinâmia-CET, Ana Catarina Ferreira, ISCTE-IUL, CIES – Centro de Investigação e Estudos de Sociologia; Universidade Nova de Lisboa, FCSH, Urban in/justice and quasi-quantitative mapping: Placing gated residential developments and social rehousing processes in Lisbon metro||20||4:40 PM|
To access contact information login