We live in times of ambivalence in which many traditional wisdoms are now revisited/retaken to allow two-sided readings. Gaining centrality of such scholarly debates are cities, which illustrates the ambivalences, contradictions and promises of existing global societies. Using “urban entrepreneurialization 2.0”, this session invites reflections on the present urban process that has unfolded both new-neoliberal economies and insurgent practices of municipal, community-based democracy.
First of all, the term entrepreneurship deserves revisiting. Post-recession societies offer a powerful illustration of what Michel Foucault identified as the ‘entrepreneur of the self’ in his writings on neoliberal governmentality (Foucault, 2005). In this regard, one can observe a qualitative shift with respect to the entrepreneurialization of urban governance that David Harvey brought to light in the late 1980s (Harvey, 1989). The writing by Hard and Negri in their recent book Assembly retakes the word to argue for collective bio-political agency of the multitude to demonstrate autonomy in the production in factories and beyond. Nevertheless, the flip side of the happy and self-actualisation project promised by “self-entrepreneualism” and “everyone has become an entrepreneur” has also witnessed an array of well documented critiques on self-disciplinary and self-exploitation. With an emphasis put on procedural reading, we uses the term ‘entrepreneurialization of city life’ to call for studies that involve not only the governance structures of capitalist cities but the mobilization of society at large and life itself for both capitalist and non-capitalist purposes.
Amalgamating urban and entrepreneurialization, this session also tends to revisit the machinic assemblage. In other words, how to study the relational interaction of body-environment and the anthropogenetic constitution of urban economies and societies. For some, the ‘mobilizing potential of place’, that is, the ambient power of place is a process of encounter, where various human and non-human elements assemble in a way that particular moral value or social norm is enacted, sensed, felt, and also reacted (Allen, 2006; Roberts, 2012; Thrift, 2007). For some others, machinic subjectivity is inherent in the ‘cooperative intelligence’ of human being, such that “a multitude is formed capable of ruling and leading itself to conceive and carry out strategic goals” (Hardt and Negri, 2017). In one way or another, today’s urban environments offer evidence of a wide array of practices, projects and experiments – on both capitalist and non-capitalist sides – that draw on what we have defined ‘the mobilizing potential of place’ and the cooperative intelligence of human being.
If you are interested in taking part in this session, please contact June (firstname.lastname@example.org) and/or Ugo (email@example.com) with an abstract of no more than 250 words by Friday 20th October 2018 (earlier the better!). We will then get back to you by Monday 23 October with a decision.
Ahmed, S. (2010) The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke UP
Davies, W. (2015) The Happiness Industry: How the Government and Big Business Sold us Well-Being. London: Verso.
Foucault, M. (2008), The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the College de France, 1978–79, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2017). Assembly. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Harvey, D. (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler B: Human Geography 71(1)
|Presenter||Letizia Chiappini*, University of Amsterdam, University of Milan-Bicocca, Petter Törnberg, University of Amsterdam, AirBnB as a platform for gentrification in the self-entrepreneurial city: comparing cultural and economic impact of AirBnB in New York, Barcelona and Amsterdam||20||5:20 PM|
|Presenter||Kijun Yun*, KAIST, Informating Urban Life, Engendering Spatial Technology||20||5:40 PM|
|Presenter||Andrew Zitcer*, Drexel University, After Virtue: Cooperation as a Social and Economic Practice||20||6:00 PM|
|Presenter||Ann Kingsolver*, University of Kentucky, Annapurna Pandey*, UCSC, “Make in India” and “Made in America”: Comparing Experiences and Interpretations of Economic Nationalism by Workers in India and the U.S.||20||6:20 PM|
To access contact information login