Authors: Patrick Schukalla*,
Topics: Natural Resources, Africa, Economic Geography
Keywords: nuclear geographies, uranium mining, geological exploration
Session Type: Paper
Start / End Time: 8:00 AM / 9:40 AM
Room: 8224, Park Tower Suites, Marriott, Lobby Level
Presentation File: No File Uploaded
Scholars and activists working on nuclear fuel production argue that uranium mines often end up as the forgotten sources of nuclear power. Yet, before the fissionable element can be mined, uranium deposits have to be discovered, geological data has to be gathered and reaffirmed, controversies with on-surface usages and valuations of the respective area have to be ‘settled’, licenses have to be acquired and agreements with governments and national as well as international institutions have to be signed, a mine has to be built and transportation routes for the radioactive material have to be adjusted and secured. These pre-conditional processes of uranium ‘becoming’ a resource are obscured from our view by a general focus on successfully established mines and the ‘spectacular’ parts of the fuel chain. I refer to these preparatory and pre-conditional processes as “becoming the nuclear front-end”. The term builds on the industry’s schematic subdivision into stages from the front-end (mining, milling), the production phase (running NPPs) to the back-end of the fuel chain (reprocessing, waste disposal). Disguised in such schematic representations and within the reactor core itself are the condensed global connections and uneven relations that facilitate its existence. The contribution’s aim is to follow uranium not only back to the mine, but to how, when and why it was explored, desired, ‘dropped’, reconsidered or kept ‘in reserve’ as geological knowledge. The analysis includes ethnographic and archival empirical insights from the centres of the global nuclear industry to its margins in Central- and Southern Tanzania.