If you are interested in presenting a paper in this session please send me your abstract (100-150 words) as soon as possible.
Professor Alun Jones
School of Geography, University College Dublin
Diplomacy has been seen traditionally as one of the principal means of projecting and legitimising state interests and identities internationally, with diplomatic practice playing a key role in the (re)ordering and (re)structuring of these identities. However, recent research from across the social sciences has begun to problematize this view, by showing how diplomatic practice is subject to innumerable spatial-temporal contingencies. These include the critical importance of the mundane to shaping “big-picture” diplomatic imperatives; how everyday practice effects and affects the folding of spaces and scales of diplomacy and foreign policy-making; and the use of diplomatic tropes by non-state actors to fashion new geopolitical possibilities. Thus, while diplomacy remains crucial to creating the illusion of state presence and the existing status quo of international political relations, and gives rise to the ordering of the state at home and at – a – distance, its constituent practices are increasingly liable to contestation and conflict, with substantial consequences for contemporary expressions of state legitimacy.
This session will consider these contemporary (dis)orderings of diplomacy, established diplomatic practice and alternative (including ‘public’, ‘integrated’, and ‘cultural’) forms of diplomacy, and their spatial and geographic consequences. Papers highlighting the role of diplomacy in global politics, its practices and spaces, orderings and transactions are particularly welcomed, as are contributions addressing diplomacy’s technologies and assemblages; its fields of operation and multiple stakeholders; and how future geographies of diplomacy might be sustained over time and through space. Similarly, contributions are welcomed on more emancipatory questions for geographies of diplomacy, for example, gender and diplomacy, and engaging with why and how actors are authenticated to speak, negotiate, and advocate on behalf of ‘the state’ and its consequences. Theoretical, methodological and/or empirical insights that address one or more of the above themes are encouraged. The session’s contribution is threefold: to foreground the relatively neglected role of geographies of diplomacy as spatially and temporally contingent processes; highlight the potential contribution of research on diplomacy to practice-based accounts of international studies; and explore some of the methodological challenges confronting researchers in this endeavour
|Presenter||Judit Kuschnitzki*, University of Cambridge, Subversive Diplomats? A Study of Diplomatic Discretion and Resistance in Moments of Rupture||18||9:55 AM|
|Presenter||Merje Kuus*, University of British Columbia, Geographies of professions: neoliberalization and the foreign policy apparatus||18||10:13 AM|
|Presenter||Jamey Essex*, University of Windsor, Joshua Bowman, University of Windsor, Far from home, close to work: Diplomacy and statecraft ‘in the field’||18||10:31 AM|
|Presenter||Thomas Jackson*, University of Cambridge, Practicing diplomats, improvising regions: paradiplomacy in the Russian Federation||18||10:49 AM|
|Presenter||Alun Jones*, University College Dublin, Towards an Emotional Geography of Diplomacy: Insights from the United Nations Security Council||18||11:07 AM|
|Discussant||Jason Dittmer University College London||10||11:25 AM|
To access contact information login