Ash, Kitchin, and Leszczynski (2018) signal a critical ‘digital turn’ in geography characterized by the growth of geographic research produced through, by, and of the digital. In conversation with previous scholarship (Elwood and Leszczynski 2013; Graham and Foster 2016), the increasing attention to the digital in geography broadly, and to “the politics of geographical knowledge production with the digital” (Ash, Kitchin, and Leszczynski 2018: 5) in particular, intersects with theoretical provocations in feminist, queer, postcolonial, and critical race scholarship. Along this vein, there have been multiple engagements between digital geographies and feminist theories of work and labor, as well as acknowledgement of the ways digital technologies, codify, reinforce, or reshape existing racial, gender, and classes inequalities (Richardson 2018; Leszczynski and Elwood 2015; Roth 2016; Holloway et al. 2000), or produce new forms of differentiation (Rose 2017).
Yet, more substantial engagements of digital geography with feminist, queer, postcolonial and critical race theory remain somewhat limited, despite an abundance of scholarship outside geography examining the entanglement of processes of technological change with such concerns. For example, critical race scholars have highlighted the complex socio-technical assemblages that both work to reproduce and reify racial categories (Brown 2015; Pugliese 2010; Weheliye 2014) and to organize various forms of resistance (Marez 2016; Weheliye 2005). Transfeminist engagements have sought to queer the boundaries between technical objects and systems and the body--between technics and biology (Egaña and Solà 2016; Sullivan and Murray 2016). Feminist scholars like Karen Barad, Rosi Briadotti, and Donna Haraway have explored the material and “technical” nature of processes of subjectification and the production of meaning. Postcolonial critiques have long noted the entanglement of colonization and ideologies of “Western” dominance with notions of technological progress (Adas 1990; Arnold 2005; Wuertenberg 2018).
In this session (or set of sessions), we hope to bring together scholars engaging questions of the digital from across feminist, transfeminist, queer, postcolonial, and critical race perspectives. We invite both theoretical and empirical contributions, including an openness to speculative approaches. Topics might include (but are not limited to):
-Ideologies of technological progress and their links to whiteness, colonialism, masculinity
-Critiques of emerging technological practices in policing, surveillance, urban governance
-Critiques of the practices of large techno-capitalist firms or “startups”
-The role of digital technologies in evolving practices of resistance
-Differences in technology use across diverse populations
-New axes of difference emergent within evolving socio-technical systems
-Critical methodologies in digital geographic inquiry
-Intersections of digital geography, environment, and race
-Technical objects, queer theory, and the body
Please submit abstracts (250 words) to both Casey Lynch (firstname.lastname@example.org) and Lily House-Peters (Lily.HousePeters@csulb.edu) by Monday, October 15, 2018.
Adas, M. (1990). Machines as the measure of men: Science, technology, and ideologies of Western dominance.
Cornell University Press.
Arnold, D. (2005). Europe, technology, and colonialism in the 20th century. History and Technology, 21(1).
Ash, J, Kitchin, R, and Leszczynski, A. (2018). Digital turn, digital geographies? Progress in Human Geography
Brown, S. (2015). Dark Matters: On Surveillance and Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Egaña, L. and Solà, M. (2016). Hacking the body: a transfeminist war machine. TSQ: Transgender Studies
Quarterly, 3(1-2): 76-81.
Holloway, S.L., Valentine, G. & Bingham, N. (2000). Institutionalizing technologies: masculinities, femininities,
and the heterosexual economy of the IT classroom. Environment and Planning A, 32(4). 617 – 633.
Leszczynski, A. & Elwood, S. (2015). Feminist geographies of new spatial media. The Canadian Geographer,
Marez, C. (2016). Farm Worker Futurism: Speculative technologies of resistance. Minneapolis, MN: University of
Pugliese, J. (2010). Biometrics: Bodies, Technologies, Biopolitics. New York and London: Routledge
Richardson, L. (2018). Feminist geographies of digital work. Progress in Human Geography. DOI:
Rose, G. (2017). Posthuman Agency in the Digitally Mediated City: Exteriorization, Individuation,
Reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 107(4)
Roth, Y. (2016). Zero Feet Away: The Digital Geography of Gay Social Media. Journal of Homosexuality 63(3):
Sullivan, N. & Murray, S., eds. (2016). Somatechnics: Queering the technologization of bodies. New York: Ashgate
Weheliye, A.G. (2005). Phonographies: Grooves in Sonic Afro-Modernity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Wuertenberg, N. (2018). Technology and the outcome of American colonization. The Activist History Review.
|Presenter||Anna Feigenbaum*, Bournemouth University, Big Data Baby-Making: Celmatix and Genetic Profiteering in the IVF Industry||20||2:35 PM|
|Presenter||Courtney Donovan*, San Francisco State University, Future Possibilities for Tech and Health Humanities: Insights from Intersectional Feminism||20||2:55 PM|
|Presenter||Jasmine Truong*, , It feels like love: Romance scam and digitally mediated spaces of the intimate||20||3:15 PM|
|Presenter||Hayal Akarsu*, , Digital Policing: Techno-optimism, Surveillance, and Political Subjectivity in the ‘Digital Age’||20||3:35 PM|
|Presenter||Kelly Sharron*, , American Monument and the Tension of Institutionalized Resistance||20||3:55 PM|
To access contact information login