We invite conceptual, methodological and empirical papers that may foster dialogue and new directions of research.
Over the years, debates in environmental issues have expanded to critically examine science-society interactions and broader environmental governance as a means of increasing both legitimacy and ‘effectiveness’ of policy and interventions (Bulkeley & Mol, 2003). Being multi-scalar and complex, climate change mitigation and adaptation is particularly suited for investigating greater inclusivity within governance, decision-making, and knowledge production practices (Armitage et al., 2011; Collins & Ison, 2009; van Kerkhoff & Lebel, 2015). This expansion results in different understandings of science-society interactions to support the implementation of climate mitigation and adaptation projects. For example, co-production and the facilitation of participatory knowledge production and governance seeks to enhance accountability and equity within processes of climate mitigation and adaptation. Often designed by external actors, these arrangements frequently seek to ‘target’ a particular group of ‘beneficiaries’ or ‘users’ so that climate-related interventions, projects, governance, and knowledge bases reflect targeted livelihoods and lived experiences. This ‘targeting’ of participation in climate mitigation and adaptation intervention requires the creation, deployment, and alignment of categorizations and boundaries to define who knows about climate change, who is affected by it, what should be done, and who should benefit. Leach, Scoones, & Wynne (2005, p. 5) point out that “representational knowledge is not simply that, but is also subtly performative…project[ing] models of the human subject into the public world.” The ‘success’ of climate mitigation and adaptation projects thus requires the production of compliant, idealized – and also partial – subjectivities in alignment with the particular logics, goals, and normativities embedded within these projects. Yet, individuals are not powerless and subjectivities are not fixed. Rather, subjectivities can be contested and/or (re-)produced through the performance of multiple, overlapping, and relational identities.
This session examines the relational and oppositional spaces in which subjectivity, identity, and agency are negotiated and realized (see e.g., Butler, 1990; Foucault, 1982; Jasanoff, 2004) within science-society interactions and, particularly, climate change mitigation and adaptation projects. We aim to explore the ways in which subjectivities are not only created in accordance with dominant discourses, but also in resistance to these, and with what effect.
• Exploring the ways subjectivity, identity and agency are produced, realized, and/or resisted through climate mitigation and adaptation discourses and projects
• Understanding the complex relations between uncertainty, credibility, and social and political legitimacy in climate mitigation and adaptation science, policy, and practice
• Empirical studies that critically illuminate spaces of: climate science/society tensions; relations of power within co-productions of knowledge and climate mitigation/adaptation; material impacts of climate interventions on lives and livelihoods
• Critical methodologies/frameworks for identifying and explaining productive tensions in science-society interactions and relations
• New theoretical directions in exploring subjectivity, identity, and agency, including in the areas of relational ontologies, intersubjectivity, and new materialism
|Presenter||Helen Rosko*, Clark University, Same Agenda, Different Subjectivities: A Case of Climate Information Services in Mali||20|
|Presenter||Meaghan Daly*, University of New England, Mara J. Goldman, University of Colorado Boulder, ‘Co-producing’ Knowledge, Producing End-Users: The Production, Circulation, and Use of Climate Knowledge in Tanzania||20|
|Presenter||Bregje Van Veelen*, University of Durham, Producing diverse and multi-scalar climate subjects: a relational approach for understanding faith-based climate action and identity||20|
|Presenter||Anna Bridel*, London School of Economics, Contesting cyclones and citizenship: the politics of risk expertise following Cyclone Ockhi in Kerala, India.||20|
|Presenter||Laura Lawler*, University of Wisconsin, Making “Climate Smart” Farmers and Fields in Tanzania||20|
To access contact information login