“Policy mobilities,” once little more than a locus of substantive interest, has since morphed into something like an approach, an analytical orientation, maybe even a method. What has been learned along the way? What (and where) next? These are the motivating questions behind these panels.
Recent years have witnessed the growth of a new interdisciplinary field, critical policy studies., motivated in part by critiques of positivist, decontextualized, and rational-actor models of the policy process but animated also by new objects and foci of analysis, including the circulation of ideas, knowledge, and models for innovation in policy-making. As especially active front in this burgeoning research field is the policy mobilities approach, which is characterized by: (a) an understanding of policymaking processes and practices as irreducibly social and deeply contextual in nature; (b) an attention to how this condition of (local) embeddedness is co-produced in complex ways through extensive networks and “inter-referencing” effects; and (c) a conviction that policies, techniques, and program designs never travel intact from place to place but are transformed in transit, (re)making the relations between policymaking sites, actors, and institutions along the way.
The sessions are motivated by a sense that the time is right to take stock of what has been achieved in policy mobilities research over the past decade and to explore what might be the most productive next steps. While urbanists and geographers have been particularly active in the discussion, they occupy but one part of what has been a dynamic and interdisciplinary field of critical policy studies, one that reaches into anthropology, sociology, development studies, education studies, and political science. This interdisciplinary and cross-disciplinary approach has been positive and productive but in some respects the conversation is just beginning. Sessions convened at the AAG in Washington, DC will initiate conversations that will be continued at the AAA meetings in Vancouver in November, 2019 and elsewhere. In addition to the need to extend and deepen the interdisciplinary dialogue among researchers, there are normative and political reasons to reflect critically on the phenomenon-cum-syndrome of trans-urban policymaking and global-local experimentation too, in light of the circulation of fast-traveling, prescriptive, and often preemptive policy models, the rise of a new generation of peripatetic experts and urban gurus, and the ascendancy of alternative policy networks and alt-models that seek to produce and circulate counterhegemonic approaches in the face of entrenched orthodoxies.
Two paper sessions and a panel discussion at the AAG meetings will address two overarching questions: “what next?” and “how?” The first question could involve some taking stock of what has been achieved so far, but perhaps more importantly, we would hope that contributors would look forward to address what might be some of the remaining challenges, constructive next steps, and so forth. The second question would again mix a retrospective glance with a prospective orientation to address how we theorize and research policy mobilities, with particular attention to matters of methodology and research design. What are the limitations of extant approaches? How might methodological approaches in the field be productively deepened and diversified? How might policy mobilities studies “speak back” to theories and concepts? How have questions of positionality, ethical responsibilities, situation, and context been addressed in policy mobilities studies?
|Presenter||Shenjing He*, The University of Hong Kong, Policy mobilities, politics of scale and latecomer advantages: Globalizing strategies of small inland cities||20||3:05 PM|
|Presenter||Rachel Bok*, University of British Columbia, Jamie Peck*, University of British Columbia, Jun Zhang, University of Toronto, A necessary delusion? The Hong Kong model, (post)colonial practice, and the neoliberal imagination||20||3:25 PM|
|Presenter||Emma Colven*, University of Oklahoma, Disruptive & productive frictions: The messiness of globalizing the Dutch Delta Approach||20||3:45 PM|
|Presenter||Nik Theodore*, University of Illinois at Chicago, How movements move: a policy mobilities approach to studying repertoires of contestation||20||4:05 PM|
|Discussant||Gianpaolo Baiocchi||20||4:25 PM|
To access contact information login