In order to join virtual sessions, you must be registered and logged-in(Were you registered for the in-person meeting in Denver? if yes, just log in.) 
Note: All session times are in Mountain Daylight Time.

U.S. Census Data Quality at Risk: Potential Impacts of New Privacy Protections

Type: Panel
Theme:
Sponsor Groups: Applied Geography Specialty Group, Population Specialty Group
Poster #:
Day: 4/7/2020
Start / End Time: 11:50 AM / 1:05 PM (MDT)
Room: Virtual Track 12
Organizers: Jonathan Schroeder, David Van Riper, Tracy Kugler
Chairs: Jonathan Schroeder

Description

Protecting the privacy of census respondents while publishing quality data are dual mandates for the U.S. Census Bureau. In August 2018, the Bureau announced a major change in their approach to privacy protection. According to the Bureau, increases in computing power and access to large individual-level databases mean that their traditional disclosure avoidance techniques no longer provide strong enough protection. In response, the Bureau plans to adopt a framework termed “differential privacy” for its 2020 Census disclosure avoidance system, which will entail injecting random noise into nearly all published data in order to guarantee a minimal risk of privacy loss.

While the planned approach would achieve state-of-the-art privacy protections, we believe census data users should be deeply concerned. A strict application of differential privacy would have pervasive and potentially severe impacts on the utility and accuracy of the country’s benchmark population data.

To help data users assess potential impacts and report their concerns, the Census Bureau has released demonstration data products, which supply differentially private versions of 1940 and 2010 data. In this session, the organizers will provide an overview of the Bureau’s reported plans, and panelists will present and discuss findings about the accuracy and utility of the demonstration data for various use cases.


Agenda

Type Details Minutes
Introduction Tracy Kugler IPUMS 9
Introduction David Van Riper Minnesota Population Center 9
Panelist Jason Jurjevich Portland State University 9
Panelist John Cromartie USDA 9
Panelist Nicholas Nagle University of Tennessee 9
Panelist Jason Devine US Census Bureau 9

To access contact information login