Dylan M. Harris, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO
Alana Rader, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
In an era of multiple, intersecting, and competing crises - from climate change to the global rise in authoritarianism - there is a push for scholarship that moves beyond critique and towards experimentation (Braun, 2015; Tsing et al., 2017). In the context of an apparent Anthropocene, there is an acknowledgement that research-as-usual may not be able to address the magnitude and complexity of ongoing change. As such, experimental socioecological approaches allow us to re-evaluate if the configuration of our research and our relationship to what we research is effective in addressing pressing issues such as climate change (Braverman, 2018; Knappe et al., 2019). Given this re-evaluation, and in light of the immediacy of global environmental change, there is an opportunity do socioecological research differently, more experimentally.
For this session, we are inspired by what appears to be a growing trend in experimental socioecological research. Increasingly, exciting and innovative projects within Geography are challenging ecological norms to think more creatively and expansively about how biophysical research can be done (Lorimer & Driessen, 2013; Biermann, 2016). Further, researchers are working more collaboratively to build new kinds of socioecological knowledge in the face of significant change (Whatmore & Landström, 2011; Buck, 2019). Within these projects, we can acknowledge and celebrate both diverse perspectives that have been historically overlooked or appropriated (Bethel et al, 2014; Singh, 2018), and knowledge production practices that synthesize and create new forms of socioecological knowledge (De La Cadena, 2015). We are drawn to research that experimentally combines multiple theoretical, methodological, and empirical approaches across disciplinary boundaries (e.g., Lave et al., 2018; Shaw & Corner, 2017) to think through the dual realities of complexity and emergence in the context of the crises mentioned above.
Bethel, M. B., L. F. Brien, M. M. Esposito, C. T. Miller, H. S. Buras, S. B. Laska, R. Philippe, K. J. Peterson, C. P. Richards. (2014) Sci-TEK: A GIS-Based Multidisciplinary Method for Incorporating Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Louisiana's Coastal Restoration Decision-Making Processes. Journal of Coastal Research. 30, 5: 1081-1099.
Biermann, C. (2016) Securing forests from the scourge of blight: the biopolitics of nature and nation. Geoforum, 75: 210-219.
Braun, B. (2015) From critique to experiment? Rethinking political ecology for the Anthropocene. The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Perraul, T., Bridges, G., McCarthy, J. eds. New York, NY: Routledge.
Braverman, I. (2018) Coral Whispheres: Scientists on the Brink. University of California Press.
Buck, H. J. (2019) After Geoengineering: Climate Tragedy, Repair, and Restoration. New York, NY: Verso.
De La Cadenda, M. (2015) Earth Beings: Ecologies of Practice Across Andean Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Knappe, Henrike, Anne-Katrin Holfelder, David Löw Beer, Patrizia Nanz (2019) "The politics of making and unmaking (sustainable) futures: introduction to the special feature" in Sustainability Science 14:891-898
Lave, R., C. Biermann, and S. Lane. (2018) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography. Palgrave MacMillan.
Lorimer, J. and C. Driessen. (2013) Wild experiments at the Oostvaardersplassen: rethinking environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 39: 2, 169-181.
Shaw, C. and A. Corner. (2017) Using Narrative Workshops to socialise the climate debate: lessons from two case studies – centre-right audiences and the Scottish public. Energy Research and Social Science.
Singh, J. (2018) Unthinking Mastery: Dehumanism and Decolonial Entanglements. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Tsing, A. L., H. A. Swanson, E. Gan, and N. Bubandt, eds., (2017) Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet: Ghosts and Monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
|Presenter||Caragh Threlfall, University of Sydney, Stephen John Livesley, University of Melbourne, Camilo Ordonez*, University of Toronto, Tenley Conway, University of Toronto, Dave Kendal, University of Tasmania, An experiment to measure the social and ecological impact of urban tree loss||15||8:00 AM|
|Presenter||Matthew John*, University of Kentucky, Beauty as Relationship, Relationship as Emancipation: A Post-Phenomenology of the Potentiality of Beautiful Places in Nature||15||8:15 AM|
|Presenter||Shruti Syal*, Virginia Commonwealth University, SESF analysis to study the intersection of informality, institutions, and infrastructure provision in urban 'slums'||15||8:30 AM|
|Presenter||Eija Meriläinen*, University College London, Ilan Kelman, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, Institute for Global Health, University College London; University of Agder, Sonja L. Myhre, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Laura E.R. Peters, Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction, Institute for Global Health, University College London; College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Michelle Scobie, University of the West Indies, Geordan Shannon, UCL Institute for Global Health, Studying the health of people and ecosystems amidst contemporary expulsions through experimental research design||15||8:45 AM|
|Presenter||Paul Burow*, Yale University, The Wisdom of Light Burning: Revitalizing Paiute Forestry for the Repair of Landscapes in the US West||15||9:00 AM|
To access contact information login